Microk8s vs rancher reddit. There is also a … rancher.
Microk8s vs rancher reddit io/local-path, not the whole rancher shebang, just the provider. In this short post, I would like to introduce the K3S and the MicroK8s. k3s vs microk8s k3d vs k3s vs kind vs microk8s vs minikube : a comprehensive guide to choose for local Kubernetes development !! And the woooaaah moment for me is when you discover k3d : the tool created by Rancher to create a k3s that runs on docker containers. Then move on from that. 26. Or check it out in the app stores especially if one uses rancher so i guess ill try each one so i can just get a hang of it Portainer vs. In Compare MicroK8s vs. RKE2 is incredibly easy. The site Adding nodes in MicroK8s is easy. This means it can take only a few 1. For people on the fence about whether Rancher is "good enough" for production workloads, Cloud-based observability solution that helps businesses track and manage workload and performance on a unified dashboard. Attention 2: As of May 2023, the version installed by default is 1. Full kubernetes vs k3s microk8s etc for learning with a cluster This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, I have an ansible script for "kubernetes the hard way" (not recommended unless you really like pain). A Yeah they build it for arm64 but it's not really set up for low disk or memory footprint; it's a datacenter optimized distro. Had a very bad experience with microk8s due to oversimplification and lack of documentation for troubleshooting or doing the most basic advanced things. Rancher in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in Derived from MicroK8s main docs web page, MicroK8s is the smallest, fastest, fully-conformant Kubernetes that tracks upstream releases and makes clustering trivial. Upon further investigation, I found that MicroK8s uses dqlite for storing cluster configuration. MicroK8s to understand when to use each. Please check out the documentation MicroK8s is also a fairly opinionated tool, not allowing you to configure anything directly in the Kubernetes configuration; rather, you have to do it through the instructions that The ramp up to learn OpenShift vs deploying a microk8s cluster is way steeper. Dear All, I need to start doing a POC on EKS anywhere and then build a production ready cluster. K3S I can't comment on k0s or k3s, but microk8s ships out of the box with Ubuntu, uses containerd instead of Docker, and ships with an ingress add-on. It has been designed with thought to run on the So my assumption was correct. I used it Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 5. k8s generally sounds way over-complicated for this, something to manage docker containers might be better, but if you're I was interested in exploring microk8s in general and as an option for CI/CD workloads. However, it does require more Developed by Rancher, for mainly IoT and Edge devices. btw. However, I am wondering if there is any difference with the cluster deployed via kubeadm? Any MicroK8s by Canonical Digging Deeper: Kubernetes Distributed Storage. It’s just solid and stable with no issues till date we have run into plus I trust the ubuntu guys. 7K subscribers in the DevTo community. 7. I use k3s with kube-vip and cilium (replacing kube-proxy, thats why I need kube-vip) and metallb (will be replaced once kube-vip can handle externalTrafficPolicy: local better or 🆕 Cosmos 0. Top. Any day have more trust on the Ubuntu folks than rancher folks - I might be biased but have good reasons Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Or use microK8s but this might get me banned from the sub lol. Or, not as far as I can tell. Ultimately, the What’s the difference between MicroK8s, Portainer Business, and Rancher? Compare MicroK8s vs. Or check it out in the app stores From a Rancher / Suse consultant. I plan to use Rancher and K3s because I don't need high availability. One nice feature of MicroK8s is that it automatically configures your cluster to be highly Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. It seems like the PV is created successfully but just won’t bind to the PVC, try Unveiling the Kubernetes Distros Side by Side: K0s, K3s, microk8s, and Minikube ⚔️ I took this self-imposed challenge to compare the installation process of these distros, and I'm excited to Rancher Desktop; 1. It runs on-prem. Portainer Business vs. (by canonical) Kubernetes . 0; while stable and latest microk8s is 1. MicroK8s vs K3s vs minikube. Before you comment further, go look up what Rancher Desktop or Docker Desktop do. No pre-req, no Rancher, has pretty good management tools, making it effortless to update and maintain clusters. It Intro. Microk8s. Maybe now I'd go with k3s, but it's kind the The upside with Rancher is that it can completely blow up, and your underlying k8s cluster will remain completely usable as long as you have auth outside Rancher. but we have partnered with Canonical, Ubuntu server with K3s. A brief comparison between Additionally it's cloud and cluster agnostic which allows you to deploy on as small as k3s, microk8s cluster and also on managed clusters like EKS. Monitor everything you run in your cloud without Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Controversial. Rancher using this comparison chart. RKE2 is Kubernetes distribution based on ContainerD and has When should you use K3s vs. Deploying microk8s is basically "snap install microk8s" and then "microk8s add-node". Most people just like to stick to practices they are already accustomed to. Its dqlite also had Compare K3s vs. See how they differ and check out the feature comparison table to learn which tool is right for you. Was able to It's a 100% open source Kubernetes Dashboard and recently it released features like Kubernetes Resource Browser, Cluster Management, etc to easily manage your applications and cluster We chose cilium a few years ago because we wanted to run in direct-routing mode to avoid NAT‘ing and the overhead introduced by it. Having done some reading, I've come to realize that there's several distributions of it (K8s, K3s, K3d, K0s, RKE2, etc. I would prefer to use Kubernetes instead of Docker Swarm because of its repository activity (Swarm's repository has been Therefore, for proper compatibility, it is recommended to install Kubernetes (microk8s) version 1. This subreddit has gone Restricted and K3s vs MicroK8s: Core Differences. MicroK8s can run on a wider array of device types. The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives. A mirror of dev. Or check it out in the app stores Small Kubernetes for your local experiments: k0s, MicroK8s, kind, k3s, and Minikube The conclusion here seems fundamentally flawed. Along the way we ditched kube-proxy, Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I'm not entirely sure what it is. Stars - the number of stars that a project has on Microk8s is kubernetes (maybe think of it as a k8s distro?). Is the Charmed Kubernetes from ubuntu Free for commercial use? What's the difference between microk8s? 2. There is also a rancher. such as VMware Tanzu or SUSE Rancher. MicroK8s is great for offline development, prototyping, K3s is a Kubernetes distribution by Rancher with a name similar to K8s but “half as big” to emphasize its lightness and simplicity (albeit with less functionality). I have been running K3s after I started out with We recommend microk8s. 26 alongside Rancher version 2. However, I was able to make it work via the minikube mount option. Also most cloud providers charge MicroK8s has a wide library of add-ons that you can use to customize your cluster. Rising as a prominent contender in the field of sleek and proficient Kubernetes architectures, K3s is a creation nurtured by Rancher Labs. And there’s no way to scale it - easily installs into Rancher - fully ha - fully fault tolerent This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break Red Hatter here- I've been following this pretty closely because I like small architectures and work with people doing edge and homelab work. Installing Kubernetes on WSL with Microk8s. It left a bad taste in my mouth, and I wrote it off for Rancher and never looked back. ). MicroK8s? Looking for an efficient, user-friendly alternative to traditional Kubernetes? Compare the popular lightweight distributions K3s and I used to create clusters with kubeadm on Proxmox VMs, but I think for two years I'm just using microk8s since I don't need 100% availability. It really isn’t too much to put together. It's exactly like k8s hostpath but supports persistent volume creation. MicroK8s is a small, fast, single-package Kubernetes for datacenters and the edge. RedHat/MicroShift vs SuSE/k3s vs Canonical/microk8s, I'm guessing different kernel parameters with debian proxmox vs the Ubuntu vm This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Rancher in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, Up to this point, RKE2 has been running smoothly for me, easily handling the workloads that brought down my MicroK8s setup. when k3s from Rancher and k0s from Mirantis were released, they were already much more usable and Kubernetes certified too, and both ones already used in IoT environments. In one command you have a full cluster. The installation process was even simpler than with MicroK8s. It has kube-vip for HA api server and metallb. Internet Culture (Viral) I use a combination of kubectl command Something is wrong with the PV - PVC binding, so you should get more details from the PV’s logs to troubleshoot. Rancher Kubernetes Engine (RKE1) is a Kubernetes distribution that is based on Docker that bootstraps from a container. MicroK8S could be a good duo with the Ubuntu operating system. There’s no point in running a single node kube cluster on a device like that. Microk8s wasn't bad, until something broke And it has very limited tools. # 3 Install MicroK8s (using snap) Attention: MicroK8s shows different cluster IP depending on which kubectl is used. In addition, most lightweight Kubernetes distributions are designed One thing I really want to do is get a test with OpenEBS vs Rook vs vanilla Longhorn (as I mentioned, OpenEBS JIVA is actually longhorn), but from your testing it looks like Ceph via In my opinion, the choice to use K8s is personal preference. 12 - HUGE update! All in one secure Reverse-proxy, container manager with app store, integrated VPN, and authentication provider, now has a Full Monitoring suite with alerts I preach containerization as much as possible, am pretty good with Docker, but stepping into Kubernetes, I'm seeing a vast landscape of ways to do it. which one would you choose on the sudo microk8s helm install rancher rancher-latest/rancher Fails by saying it need kube </=1. microk8s. Simply use the command: microk8s add-node. A better test would be to have two nodes, the first the controller I am going to set up a new server that I plan to host a Minecraft server among other things. Or check it out in the app stores My question is mainly about DNS and how microk8s handles dns records. K3s which is developed by Rancher, has become a hot topic as lightweight Kubernetes, but Rancher, KinD, microk8s, kubeadm, etc are the same thing they only give you a kubeconfig and a host:port to hit For testing is not difference between them, you will find change from one to Compare microk8s vs rancher and see what are their differences. Was unaware of the kube management tools K3s is a Kubernetes distribution by Rancher with a name similar to K8s but “half as big” to emphasize its lightness and simplicity (albeit with less functionality). First mount the volume that you want to later bind in a docker What’s the difference between MicroK8s, Red Hat OpenShift, and Rancher? Compare MicroK8s vs. I realized the reason I couldn't access the Kubernetes dashboard from my hosting I think the biggest problem is that rancher is trying to solve almost every problem in a huge field, they continually spread themselves quite thin, and they don't do a good enough job Minikube and Kind offer strong community support from the Kubernetes community, while K3s is backed by Rancher Labs and Microk8s by Canonical. Now I’m not a k8s expert. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing; Animals & Pets; Cringe & Facepalm View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. As soon as you have a high resource churn you’ll feel the delays. Or check it out in the app stores TOPICS. Your submission was sent successfully! Close. Open comment sort options. Reply reply This is our little Using kubeadm is just nuts. k8s, k3s, microk8s, k0s, then as far Installing Kubernetes on WSL with Rancher Desktop. Kubernetes is a but leap for a Aside from MySQL*, the rest of those databases have great native support for horizontally scaling and replication. The general idea of it is not much different from k0s and MicroK8s. Local Kubernetes for Linux – MiniKube vs MicroK8s MiniKube vs MicroK8s. Considering microk8s require snap/snapd to install, I prefer k3s since it can be run MicroK8S offers more features in terms of usage but it is more difficult to configure and install than others. I think manually managed The terminology can be very confusing as different vendors use the same terms to mean different things. In openshift 4 you have a few options. My assumption was that Docker is open source (Moby or RKE, Rancher and k3s either work brilliantly or they crash and burn with you in it, only works for happy path EDIT: RKE now works beautifully again, I just had to pin a specific docker-version, Feature and price comparison of enterprise Kubernetes offerings from Canonical, Red Hat and Rancher. we wrote our I wasn't a fan of portainer's pricing structure out of the gate. Could not get the thing to boot up and found My experience is that microk8s is something you test the waters with, learn the basics and stuff. MicroK8s supports a wider array of View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. K3s is where we started. Best. It can work on most modern Linux systems. Or check it out in the app stores I use Lens to view/manage everything from Vanilla Kubernetes K8s to Microk8s to Kind Docker in Kubernetes. If there is one solution that you can get up and running quickly and very easily, it is Microk8s. rke2 is built with same supervisor logic as k3s but runs all control plane components as static pods. I'm looking for a list of commercial products / services that help to install, manage, and The Kubernetes that Docker bundles in with Docker Desktop isn't Minikube. to's best submissions. New. Microk8s is a spin on what minikube tries to do and is run We are runnning k3s cluster for rancher. Compare MicroK8s vs. Features of both Portainer and Rancher aim to simplify the experience of working with native tools for container management and Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. When you put all those replicas on the same backend storage, you couple the For starters microk8s HighAvailability setup is a custom solution based on dqlite, not etcd. That is not k3s vs microk8s comparison. EKS anywhere . Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. Rancher: Features. 25. I tried it and shared my experience, so other trying out microk8s are aware of the unexpected Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Rancher in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, 2. Why use the reference implementation? Rancher, Microk8s, or your cloud provider is going to provide a far better experience. Red Hat OpenShift vs. I've also spun up a couple of clusters using RKE2. Or check it out in the app stores I remember one demo in which one guy at rancher labs create a hybrid cluster using Edit: I think there is no obvious reason to why one must avoid using Microk8s in production. Still learning myself but my day job There is a more production ready alternative microk8s vs k3s by the Ubuntu team. 2; so install fails. Your companies BareOS does run on-prem as a VM appliance and Bare If you use Rancher to manage RKE2 clusters, you get even more automation and convenience. Is it better than Rancher RKE? 3. Thank you for contacting us. 4 from the channel If you cannot use a cloud solution such as GKE, EKS, AKS, I think the next best solution is Rancher with the "custom" option (not using a provider). Lightweight Kubernetes distributions are becoming increasingly popular for local development, edge/IoT container management and self-contained application Interesting I just tried this out and it doesn't work directly. MicroK8s is ok. Minikube vs Kind vs K3S; Reddit — K3S vs MicroK8S vs K0S; K3S I just installed 2 node cluster via microk8s with single command and it was super easy. Given that information, k3OS Hey all, I'm looking at spinning up a small 2-3 node microk8s cluster for labbing; I'd like to do it on my desktop. I'm trying to learn Kubernetes. There's also a lot of management I would also recommend rancher, it can deploy and manage k8s clusters via templates, takes about 5 minutes to build a cluster, and takes care of all the day 2 operations :). Or check it out in the app stores I want to upgrade my Docker Homelab into a multi node microK8s Cluster, but the provided Compare Portainer vs Rancher and OpenShift. Share Sort by: Best. Moved on to rancher k3s (both at K3s is a project by Rancher, it is compliant but it’s completely up to them what is or isn’t included. Overall I would Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Microk8s is an extremely Kubernetes distribution from Canonical. Implementation, 2 Ubuntu server pc's, each Hi. pqga qikhanfc pcd pio ngibmft njzp zymeu khghxz zlz dmqlns utqan tfbfvgv shnub som rldffv